Okay, I apologize. I now see the error of my ways. Please forgive my ignorance---I did NOT, in any way, mean to imply that YOU had done anything wrong---my "reply-all" had just never done that before and I was, um, confused. = /

----Original Message Follows----

From: "NightStorm"

Reply-To: The New Improved Less Lame List

To: "The New Improved Less Lame List"

Subject: Re: [creedtalk] Re: [ Creed Discuss ] Concert Time!!

Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 17:08:23 -0400

If you only sent it to one address, then why do the headers say you sent to both? That's something that happens at the user end... not the server. The server simply reads the headers of the mail and does what it's told to do. The headers, in this case, tell the server to send a mail to creedtalk, and a copy to creed-discuss (as below in the "X-MSReally-To:" amd the "To:" lines).

Return-path:

Received: from mail.debbir.com (unverified [63.151.86.5]) by mail.tucker-usa.com

(Vircom SMTPRS 5.0.194) with ESMTP id ;

Fri, 30 Aug 2002 16:24:55 -0400

Received: from hotmail.com ([])

by mail.debbir.com (Merak 5.0.2) with ESMTP id 61EBBB88;

Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:24:06 -0700

X-MSReally-To: creed-discuss@debbir.com

X-MSReally-To: creedtalk@debbir.com

Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC;

Fri, 30 Aug 2002 13:24:15 -0700

Received: from 66.190.214.126 by pv0fd.pav0.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP;

Fri, 30 Aug 2002 20:24:14 GMT

X-Originating-IP: [66.190.214.126]

To: creed-discuss@debbir.com, creedtalk@debbir.com

Bcc:

Subject: [creedtalk] Re: [ Creed Discuss ] Concert Time!!

Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 15:24:14 -0500

Mime-Version: 1.0

Content-Type: text/html

Message-ID:

X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Aug 2002 20:24:15.0254 (UTC) FILETIME=[35B08360:01C25063]

Reply-To: The only creed list worth reading

From: "Kimberly Reid"